Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Yuri Bezmenov's avatar

The chart of the century is powerful. It illustrates how administrative bloat has made healthcare and education more expensive and lower quality. Here are more charts that show how commissars are making our country less healthy and intelligent: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/how-to-fire-a-commissar-part-2

Expand full comment
Jeffrey L Minch's avatar

There are four considerations worthy of adding to this discussion:

1. There has to be a financial consideration that asks, "How big of a regulatory state can we afford?"

This has an impact on taxes. How much can the state take from the taxpayers and what should the taxpayers expect from the perspective of fairness.

I have never made any business mistakes when I was broke. The gov't should operate like it's broke.

2. There is a gigantic problem with the creation of rules. When the Congress and President pass a law, the rules must be created to implement that law.

Almost 100% of the time, the implementing rules -- drafted by the agency that will enforce them -- far exceed the authority actually mandated by Congress.

[If you are a serious student of this mischief, you will immediately note the Chevron legal precedent and its inherent danger.]

Chief amongst such examples is the EPA that expanded its authority to regulate navigable waters to stock ponds on ranches because the stock pond overrun drained into streams and then rivers that connected to navigable waters.

It took the SCOTUS to fix this gigantic regulatory overstep.

3. Texas has something called the Sunset Advisory Commission to review the authorization and practices of more than 130 state agencies. Since 1977, they have abolished 92 agencies with 41 completely terminated and 51 had their functions consolidated with another existing agency.

This is a good practice and actually works. It exists today.

It is no stretch to suggest this is one of the reasons why Texas' economy flourishes.

4. The most effective means of "walking the cat backwards" is to go back and examine why entire agencies and gov't departments were created. There is no real reason to have a Dept of Ed when funding is derived from local property taxes within school districts.

Trump had a good program whereby any new regulation could only be enacted if two existing regs were eliminated. That was good policy.

JLM

www.themusingsofthebigredcar.com

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts